Saturday, November 20, 2010
Fighter Gap
The F-35 situation doesn't seem to be getting any better. If they ever do reach production, we have now pledged 20 free ones for Isreal, a brilliant move for a country that can't afford it's own military. Last year the Pentagon threw out over 200 tactical aircraft, airframes that we can't afford to lose and we can't afford to replace. Rumor is that someone now realized that was a mistake and some might be returning to service. The good news is that there is now more talk about buying fourth generation fighters. One plan is to buy new block 50 F-16s. Another rumor is that we might start looking at buying block 60s and hopefully that will happen, as it would help hold us over for a few decades.
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Aviation Nation 2010
Aviation Nation 2010, Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, Nevada 2010.11.13-14
As usual, November brings with it one of the best air shows of the year. This time, Aviation Nation was a bit scaled back - there was only two tactical demo teams, but the level of energy managed to stay high.
Performers:
Thunderbirds (F-16)
F-22 (Zeke's final demo)
F/A-18C
F-16 Aggressor fly-by
Nellis fly-by: F-16C, A-10, F-15C (Aggressor)
F-4
T-33
CSAR (modern): F-16C, A-10, C-130, HH-60
CSAR (Vietnam): F-4, A-1, O-2, UH-1
Notable statics:
Nellis Line-up: F-16C, A-10, F-22, F-15C, F-15E, F-15C Aggressor, F-16C Aggressor
F/A-18C,F/A-18C(NASA), F-5E(N)
A-10, Typhoon (British), T-38
E-2C, EA-6B
B-52, E-6, RC-135
C-5, C-17, C-130, MV-22
Photo Album
Thanks to the members of the 64th AS and the 65th AS, they were great to talk to, especially the 64th commander, Shaggy. There was some info on upcoming aggressor paint schemes. As the 64th receives aircraft from the Duluth MN ANG during its conversion to the block 25, two of the aircraft will get the arctic scheme. There is also a proposed new blue flanker scheme. As for the 65th, the F-15 will be getting a splinter scheme.
+: Aggressor fly-by, CSAR demo
-:No extra TAC or foreign demo, no C-17 demo, No B-1B static. Bus fubar on Saturday caused attendees to miss the first hour of the show, most importantly the aggressor fly-by. Aggressor squadron T-shirts were sold out.
As usual, November brings with it one of the best air shows of the year. This time, Aviation Nation was a bit scaled back - there was only two tactical demo teams, but the level of energy managed to stay high.
Performers:
Thunderbirds (F-16)
F-22 (Zeke's final demo)
F/A-18C
F-16 Aggressor fly-by
Nellis fly-by: F-16C, A-10, F-15C (Aggressor)
F-4
T-33
CSAR (modern): F-16C, A-10, C-130, HH-60
CSAR (Vietnam): F-4, A-1, O-2, UH-1
Notable statics:
Nellis Line-up: F-16C, A-10, F-22, F-15C, F-15E, F-15C Aggressor, F-16C Aggressor
F/A-18C,F/A-18C(NASA), F-5E(N)
A-10, Typhoon (British), T-38
E-2C, EA-6B
B-52, E-6, RC-135
C-5, C-17, C-130, MV-22
Photo Album
Thanks to the members of the 64th AS and the 65th AS, they were great to talk to, especially the 64th commander, Shaggy. There was some info on upcoming aggressor paint schemes. As the 64th receives aircraft from the Duluth MN ANG during its conversion to the block 25, two of the aircraft will get the arctic scheme. There is also a proposed new blue flanker scheme. As for the 65th, the F-15 will be getting a splinter scheme.
+: Aggressor fly-by, CSAR demo
-:No extra TAC or foreign demo, no C-17 demo, No B-1B static. Bus fubar on Saturday caused attendees to miss the first hour of the show, most importantly the aggressor fly-by. Aggressor squadron T-shirts were sold out.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Great Minnesota Air Show 2010.06.26-27
After the precipitous disasters of the 2008 season, I began to wonder when St Cloud may be large enough to consider having an air show. My answer came on December 7th 2009, with the release of the jet team schedules.
The main attraction was of course the Blue Angels, but the real star of the show was the F-22, not only because of its fifth generation advancements, and its unprecedented maneuverability. More important is its rarity, with only 18 global appearances this year (up from roughly 12 last year ). This marked the first Raptor trip to Minnesota, for any F-22. Military statics were sparse, 2 EA-6Bs, NASA's F-18A and an MV-22, along with a last minute surprise of a VFC-111 F-5E.
During my five day adventure, I was able to complete my checklist, viewing all the arrivals and practices, getting close to the Raptor (briefly) and meeting the legendary, yet elusive Zeke. The only glitch, besides the weather making photography problematic, was missing part of the Raptor practice, as I was coming back fom lunch, but I did get the experience of having my car buzzed by Zeke.
Thanks to the Great Minnesota Air Show team for making that a possibility, let's hope for a continued tradition in the future. Also, thanks to Zeke, Gap, Gabe, Zeke's family and the rest of the Raptor team.
Full Photo Album
After the precipitous disasters of the 2008 season, I began to wonder when St Cloud may be large enough to consider having an air show. My answer came on December 7th 2009, with the release of the jet team schedules.
The main attraction was of course the Blue Angels, but the real star of the show was the F-22, not only because of its fifth generation advancements, and its unprecedented maneuverability. More important is its rarity, with only 18 global appearances this year (up from roughly 12 last year ). This marked the first Raptor trip to Minnesota, for any F-22. Military statics were sparse, 2 EA-6Bs, NASA's F-18A and an MV-22, along with a last minute surprise of a VFC-111 F-5E.
During my five day adventure, I was able to complete my checklist, viewing all the arrivals and practices, getting close to the Raptor (briefly) and meeting the legendary, yet elusive Zeke. The only glitch, besides the weather making photography problematic, was missing part of the Raptor practice, as I was coming back fom lunch, but I did get the experience of having my car buzzed by Zeke.
Thanks to the Great Minnesota Air Show team for making that a possibility, let's hope for a continued tradition in the future. Also, thanks to Zeke, Gap, Gabe, Zeke's family and the rest of the Raptor team.
Full Photo Album
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Wednesday, May 05, 2010
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Duluth gets Block 50 F-16s
The 148th will start getting F-16C-50s in April to replace the F-16C-25s they've had since 2003. This means that Duluth should be able to keep its vipers for the next 15+ years, and there might be something new to look at for this year's airshow.
Friday, February 05, 2010
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
The F-35 and the Trainwreck
The December 2009 issue of Airforces Monthly contained an article about the future of the Air National Guard and it's "crisis".
Regarding the ANG's fighter force, the future is not looking well [1]. They will receive only one F-22 unit and only one F-35 unit, despite the fact the ANG operates 16 out of 18 bases providing alert intercept aircraft for the protection of the U.S. The heart of the problem, as the article notes, is Gates and his "all or nothing" approach in regard to the F-35. In order to privde funding for the F-35 production line, he is retiring 254 fighters, "perfectly good F-15s and F-16s." Over recent years, it has become apparent that there will not be enough airframes to fulfill current roles. This has led some, including General Wyatt to suggest procuring new fourth generation aircraft. The DOD has responded by "discouraging" requests for new build aircraft and also dismissing the idea the Air Force could use new F/A-18s in that role.
Now, the Navy is finding its own problems with the F-35. Among them, the final cost to procure the F-35B will be $704. Also, the F-35 will cost $31,000 to maintain for every hour of flight time, compared to the current cost of $5,000 for the F-18.
So, let be clear if I haven't said this before. The F-35 should be canceled. Period. We should keep acquiring fourth generation equipment, the F-15, F-16, and F-18 can all be updated to new standards and can continue to be effective in their roles while still holding their technological superiority, all at a lower cost.
The F-22 should continue in production as well, although being clearly expensive. The F-35's cost is climbing and nearing the F-22s while producing only a some of it's capabilities. The UK has already cut their order in half. If the Navy cuts its order, the cost will go immensely, probably surpassing the F-22.
As has been noted by others every argument that has been used against the F-22- cost, narrow capability, irrelevant, etc, and has succeeded to kill the program is now being targeted against the F-35. If Gates is wrong about his all or nothing project, he may be making the worst mistake in the history of military procurement and will cost taxpayers over a trillions dollars in waste.
[1] The article also points out problems with the ANG's cargo aircraft and the problem, which has become very heated, political, and public, finding a new replacement for the 50+ year old tanker aircraft.
Regarding the ANG's fighter force, the future is not looking well [1]. They will receive only one F-22 unit and only one F-35 unit, despite the fact the ANG operates 16 out of 18 bases providing alert intercept aircraft for the protection of the U.S. The heart of the problem, as the article notes, is Gates and his "all or nothing" approach in regard to the F-35. In order to privde funding for the F-35 production line, he is retiring 254 fighters, "perfectly good F-15s and F-16s." Over recent years, it has become apparent that there will not be enough airframes to fulfill current roles. This has led some, including General Wyatt to suggest procuring new fourth generation aircraft. The DOD has responded by "discouraging" requests for new build aircraft and also dismissing the idea the Air Force could use new F/A-18s in that role.
Now, the Navy is finding its own problems with the F-35. Among them, the final cost to procure the F-35B will be $704. Also, the F-35 will cost $31,000 to maintain for every hour of flight time, compared to the current cost of $5,000 for the F-18.
So, let be clear if I haven't said this before. The F-35 should be canceled. Period. We should keep acquiring fourth generation equipment, the F-15, F-16, and F-18 can all be updated to new standards and can continue to be effective in their roles while still holding their technological superiority, all at a lower cost.
The F-22 should continue in production as well, although being clearly expensive. The F-35's cost is climbing and nearing the F-22s while producing only a some of it's capabilities. The UK has already cut their order in half. If the Navy cuts its order, the cost will go immensely, probably surpassing the F-22.
As has been noted by others every argument that has been used against the F-22- cost, narrow capability, irrelevant, etc, and has succeeded to kill the program is now being targeted against the F-35. If Gates is wrong about his all or nothing project, he may be making the worst mistake in the history of military procurement and will cost taxpayers over a trillions dollars in waste.
[1] The article also points out problems with the ANG's cargo aircraft and the problem, which has become very heated, political, and public, finding a new replacement for the 50+ year old tanker aircraft.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
