Saturday, June 07, 2014

Deke Slayton Airfest Lacrosse 2014


 Deke Slayton Airfest, Lacrosse, Wisconsin. 31.05.2014

So here we are in 2014, after the non-existent 2013 forget what I said about scaled-back shows.  Let's hope for return to 20111-12 levels over the next few years rather than this new normal.  As for Lacrosse, it was a small show to be sure.  The Blue Angels flew about 1:30, less than an hour into the show, and a few stunt and warbird acts followed.  Saturday was 90 and sunny, perfect for a high show.  Blue Angel #2 had to abort right after the take off loop, leaving a rare 5-ship demo.  Sunday was waves of rain, with enough gap for a flat show containing some lightning and thunder. There was plenty of vapor in the air for dramatic shots (I didn't come close to capturing the high-speed pass which produced a grade-A vapor cone).  Fat Albert didn't fly (presumably to load up for departure) and the Blues quickly departed by 3:30.  Statics included a few warbirds and a T-45.

Full Album 
















Monday, September 24, 2012

Duluth 2012 Airshow

Duluth IAP, MN 2012.09.22

This year's airshow was very scaled back.  There was no Air Force or Navy support (The F-16 demo team came to fly a few passes in the heritage flight - the gas, pilots and airframes were paid for - so if anybody can explain the AF's demo team stand-down to me, I can't figure it out), and the 148th didn't even fly, being mostly deployed to Afghanistan. That left the Marine's AV-8 demo, F-4, and the Canadian snowbirds.  Statics were very light including the F-16, EF-18G, F-18, T-38, C-130 and the impressive C-5A.  Weather was 37 degrees with high wind and rain, making quite a contrast to this summer.










Full Album

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Fargo Airsho 2011

Fargo Airsho - 2011.08.11-12


Military acts included:
USN Blue Angels
USN VFA-122 F/A-18E Super Hornet demo
USAF Viper West F-16 demo
B-52 / KC-135 Fly-over

Statics were a bit light in the heavy area, as the C-5 was unavailable, although there was the F-15E, F-16C, F-18F and F-18C adversary along with the C-21, C-130, and E-6.  The biggest problem was the statics was that rather than an orderly line like last time, the displays were surrounded and crammed in by various activities, the Navy Band, some Guitar Hero game, information booths, etc.  This made observing and photographing the aircraft difficult and the noise made talking to the pilots difficult as well.   The lighting was a bit poor for photography, but otherwise, the show seemed to on without problems of weather, etc.













Wednesday, July 27, 2011

133rd Air Expo 2011

To celebrate the 90th annivesary of the Minnesota Air National Guard, the 133rd Airlift Wing held an open house at MSP.  The show was light on combat aircraft, featuring only an A-10 and MSP's old F-16 block 15 museum display.  It would have been great to see Duluth bring down some of their latest block 50 F-16s.  The show was loaded with heavy aircraft, however, displaying all of the Air Force's lift capability with the C-130, C-17, C-5, KC-10, KC-135 and C-21. The only aerial performance was a SOCOM jump team, but the event did allow time for venturing through the cockpits, cargo holds, and refueling stations of those large aircraft.




Thursday, March 31, 2011

Libya and the F-22

Now that the situation is Libya has fully unfolded, it seems to operating on a much larger scale than I originally anticipated.  Now that the AC-130s, B-1Bs and A-10s have moved in, the range of hardware spans the entire arsenal, and is even more impressive given the lack of a Carrier Battle Group.  The NFZ enforcement is quite an array of F-16s, Tornadoes, Typhoons, Mirages and Rafales. Finally the UAE's Block 60 F-16s have joined in. The DOD has claimed about 200 US aircraft are involved.  Most of these are probably just support - tankers, electronic warfare, etc, but it is a number much higher than the 50 originally envisioned and the 15 USAF planes used on the first day.  Of course the only thing missing is the F-22.  As others have argued, I see this as the best opportunity to combat test the Raptor.  There are plenty of targets in a combat rich environment, but not a serious threat.  It would at least present the chance to show any flaws in the F-22 systems and a chance to test the JDAM capabilities.  Obviously the 5th gen capability is not needed in this situation, but there will be few times where it is needed beyond pure defense.  Given the wear from airtime on the 4th gen aircraft, it may be worthwhile for a Raptor deployment to absorb some of the stress, and it can fly with less worry about ground threats.  There have been ridiculous articles [1] about the B-2 flying without F-22 escorts, although this is pure fantasy, there has never been any such design in battle plans. Now they are blaming stateside basing, although the conflict is several weeks old and there was several weeks of delay before that where an F-22 detachment could have been prepped to deploy to Aviano.  In all fairness, the one unit I thought would go in first, the 493rd, has not joined in the fight but I don't see any articles complaining about the lack of F-15Cs in the coalition force.  There just doesn't seem to be any need for an air-superiority only fighter, and given that the F-22 has slightly better (than none) ground attack capability, it seems more usable than the Albino Eagle.  I can only hope that the Raptor is eventually deployed to enforce a continuing NFZ.

Some deployment discussions:
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056194800&page=3
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?p=1722742


[1]  The article, by Fox News wasted an opportunity to present the politics involved in military decision making (and a chance to attack Obama, although I think it would have been a bigger attack on Gates).  Instead their poorly written article only supports the Obama/Gates propaganda.



Tuesday, January 11, 2011

In other news, The Blue Angles have finally released their 2012 schedule, several weeks late.  Interestingly, they have passed over Duluth (ending their every-fourth-year rotation).  They have also, less surprisingly, passed over the St Cloud airshow (as well as the traditional Eau Claire show) and are appearing at Mankato MN.  The biggest problem with Mankato is its small runway forcing remote shows (as the Thunderbirds did at the last shopw in 2003).  The Blues can operate from the runway, but I would imagine the Air Force will not allow any ACC demos, resulting in a small show.  Here's hoping that the Thunderbirds pick up the St Cloud slot, allowing Minnesota to get all three North American teams in one year.
Well, the continuing F-35 saga continues to spiral downward, with the F-35B on "probation". This program continues to go in the opposite direction from where it should.  I have commented before about cancelling the F-35, and what I have really had in mind is the F-35A.  The Air Force already has a great fifth generation aircraft and doesn't really need another one.  The Navy and Marines are the ones that need fifth generation capability.  So, I would argue that the program should accelerate the F-35B and F-35C variants and sacrifice the F-35A to save hundreds of billions of dollars.  Its clear that the military will not be immune to the devastating effects of the Great Recession, and it seems clear with the retirement of the British Harriers, that the Marines need an AV-8B replacement. Upgrading the existing F-16 fleet as well as new build would bring the force to a generation 4.5 standard and allow funding for better support of the F-22 which will soon find its exclusive status encroached by the T-50 and the J-20.

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Fighter Gap

The F-35 situation doesn't seem to be getting any better. If they ever do reach production, we have now pledged 20 free ones for Isreal, a brilliant move for a country that can't afford it's own military. Last year the Pentagon threw out over 200 tactical aircraft, airframes that we can't afford to lose and we can't afford to replace.  Rumor is that someone now realized that was a mistake and some might be returning to service.  The good news is that there is now more talk about buying fourth generation fighters. One plan is to buy new block 50 F-16s. Another rumor is that we might start looking at buying block 60s and  hopefully that will happen, as it would help hold us over for a few decades.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Aviation Nation 2010

Aviation Nation 2010, Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, Nevada 2010.11.13-14



As usual, November brings with it one of the best air shows of the year. This time, Aviation Nation was a bit scaled back - there was only two tactical demo teams, but the level of energy managed to stay high.

Performers:
Thunderbirds (F-16)
F-22 (Zeke's final demo)
F/A-18C

F-16 Aggressor fly-by
Nellis fly-by: F-16C, A-10, F-15C (Aggressor)
F-4
T-33
CSAR (modern): F-16C, A-10, C-130, HH-60
CSAR (Vietnam): F-4, A-1, O-2, UH-1

Notable statics:
Nellis Line-up: F-16C, A-10, F-22, F-15C, F-15E, F-15C Aggressor, F-16C Aggressor
F/A-18C,F/A-18C(NASA), F-5E(N)
A-10, Typhoon (British), T-38
E-2C, EA-6B
B-52, E-6, RC-135
C-5, C-17, C-130, MV-22

 Photo Album













Thanks to the members of the 64th AS and the 65th AS, they were great to talk to, especially the 64th commander, Shaggy. There was some info on upcoming aggressor paint schemes. As the 64th receives aircraft from the Duluth MN ANG during its conversion to the block 25, two of the aircraft will get the arctic scheme. There is also a proposed new blue flanker scheme. As for the 65th, the F-15 will be getting a splinter scheme.






+: Aggressor fly-by, CSAR demo

-:No extra TAC or foreign demo, no C-17 demo, No B-1B static. Bus fubar on Saturday caused attendees to miss the first hour of the show, most importantly the aggressor fly-by. Aggressor squadron T-shirts were sold out.